Franklin County grand jury refuses to indict driver in deadly Rocky Mount fire truck crash

this below is the law, and it clearly states two things, first, that the emergency vehicle must drive with due safety, and being it was a red light the emergency vehicle did not drive with due safety. and two, now does this law protect the driver of any such vehicle from the consequences of an arbitrary exercise of such right-of-way. they made a arbitrary choice to exercise this right of way. so clearly ms valentine should not be charged.

46.2-829. Approach of law-enforcement or fire-fighting vehicles, rescue vehicles, or ambulances; violation as failure to yield right-of-way. Upon the approach of any emergency vehicle as defined in 46.2-920 giving audible signal by siren, exhaust whistle, or air horn designed to give automatically intermittent signals, and displaying a flashing, blinking, or alternating emergency light or lights as provided in 46.2-1022 through 46.2-1024, the driver of every other vehicle shall, as quickly as traffic and other highway conditions permit, drive to the nearest edge of the roadway, clear of any intersection of highways, and stop and remain there, unless otherwise directed by a law-enforcement officer, until the emergency vehicle has passed. This provision shall not relieve the driver of any such vehicle to which the right-of-way is to be yielded of the duty to drive with due regard for the safety of all persons using the highway, nor shall it protect the driver of any such vehicle from the consequences of an arbitrary exercise of such right-of-way.